View Full Version : UnderWorld Evolution
Greed 11-10-2005, 12:07 AM Underworld Evolution opens in January, judging by the trailer i'd say it's gonna b a better movie than the orig, but u know how trailers work
neway here b the link http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/underworldevolution/
death_knight 11-10-2005, 12:32 AM OMFG that mean the second one is awaken right. the second half vampire half lyken is awake. Ahh man this movie should be awsome, I loved that girl as well. She did very well in van Hellsing as well. Yer she's hot. Marcus is looking super crazy wings and all. too bad the dood fromt he first one [ first half lyken/vampire ] doesn't have wings. And marcus is similar to another certain vampire in a certain cool video game.. blood omen.. yep i speakof the great kaine and his legacy.
Skillachi 11-10-2005, 08:34 PM I cant say im really thrilled about this. The first one had a good concept and added a twist to the usual vampire's and warewolves storyline, but the way it was brought out sucked heavily. If its gonna be directed by the same person, i think i can miss it
Blindz 11-10-2005, 08:53 PM ****, y me neva watch this when greed did just post it, it look haaarrd, but as usual not going to trust trailers
bmobi1e 11-13-2005, 04:48 PM i agree totally wid skill
wats new a vampire with wings?
whooptido
wen they get a new director possibly some believable actors i'll watch
i do however want to know wat the storylines gonna be
im rather interested in knowing
death_knight 11-13-2005, 04:57 PM Yo be fair which other vamp/ wolve movie has ever taken a story like this has. In its elements underworld was very different from the previous vamp movies and wolves movies. the only thing that i'm not so happy about with the new story line is marcus being the first vampire bla bla blah. this sorta makes me feel like i'm watching blade with dracula and his lame armor onlything marcus is a half liken/vamp and has wings probably because he was vamp before liken blood got in him as compared to the kid who was liken before vamp blood got in him.
bmobi1e 11-13-2005, 05:27 PM so wats ur point?
we kno wwhy he's a half breed we watched the movie
my thing is why is victor back in the show?
hopefully its for like flashbacks
but hey
if the man was the first vamp dats a lie
he is the eldest vamp no doubt
he is of the corvinus bloodline
how cna he be first wen him damn dad did bread a liken and have a vamp and liken baby
di concepts again i say are different
no tnecessarily the best though
and the director cant direct
the climax of movie one (fight scene @ end)
was ridiculous
didnt grab me in anyway
the best part of the movie might have been selene shooting through the floor
i mean she shot through like 3 floors dat deep
and her jumpin goff the roof top at the beginning
she landed too gracefully it hype
death_knight 11-14-2005, 12:03 AM yo, thats a huge flaw, they have the flick being adverted with marcus as the first vamp and the most powerful vamp i think, maybe is as you saying a flash back on victor saying he was the first vamp. :dunno
caesar2004 11-28-2005, 08:05 PM it ended so stupid she chop off him head i did vex!!!!!!! BUT I HAVE TO WATCH IT WHEN IT BUSS!!!
Skillachi 02-14-2006, 10:43 AM *SPOILERS*
*IM GONNA TELL SOME OF THE STORY OF THE MOVIE, BIG SPOILATION HERE *
Ok the movie wasnt that bad... I was still dissapointed becuz the director of the first movie simply just sucked anal cavities.
And to clean up what somebody said, alexander corvinus didnt have a vampire and a lycan child. He had twin sons, one bitten by wolf, the other by bat and they therefore became the first werewolf and the first vampire.
Every scene you see with victor is of course a flashback. You learn why he became a vampire etc etc
Marcus was tuff, but i didnt see the werewolf side of him, im wondering if he could actually take on werewolf powers in the first place.
I did have a problem in how the hell michael could whoop the first lycans ass if he hasnt had any blood to drink though. Throughout the entire movie he has only taken 1 drink and that was from the girl there, so how
and also if this bredda lock up for how much centuries (william... the first lycan ie) how come him still so strong, are you saying to me that lycans dont have to eat? they can still remain super powerful even without eating? And also why couldnt they make the end more exciting, let us actually see william's human form, let us see everybody fully powered in an all out beat down. This bredda trapped for centuries in a blasted tomb with barely enough space to piss in and as soon as the door open, him ready fi tek on the whoole world again. GO TAKE A SHIT FIRST, STRETCH YOUR LEGS DAMMIT! LAME!!! :eusa_snoo
*SPOILERS END HERE*
@DK i never exactly said that the concept of the first movie was crappy. I really really enjoyed the concept of the movie, the werewolfs being the slaves who turned against their master. The anomaly of nature being the immortal who had two sons who became violent mofo's through animals, the ability to be able to become a vampwolf or a werepire.
BUT
the director of the first movie shouldve simply been shot and killed for killing what could've been one of the most unique vampire stories ever made (except for the guys that came up with the vampire werewolf idea first)
Skillachi 02-14-2006, 10:49 AM Oh and the last fight could've been better.
I did like how william died... but marcus' death could've been better
death_knight 02-14-2006, 01:00 PM Oh and the last fight could've been better.
I did like how william died... but marcus' death could've been better
i agreee 1000% percentaje.. really wtf.. i was pissed. and somehowe i feel the likans in the first movie looke better than these.
Skillachi 02-14-2006, 08:23 PM Yes the lycans in the first movie actually put up a fight, In this movie the lycans... were just like the beating sticks. Everybody and them mother was whooping lycan ass, michael pull off the head of the FIRST (and im guessing the most powerful) lycan... W T F directors sucking ass once again and heavily at that.
dem a lick out all the batty... violently... swiftly sucking out battyhole
oh and btw DK
Lycan my yute lycan
Skillachi 02-14-2006, 08:24 PM Yes the lycans in the first movie actually put up a fight, In this movie the lycans... were just like the beating sticks. Everybody and them mother was whooping lycan ass, michael pull off the head of the FIRST (and im guessing the most powerful) lycan... W T F directors sucking ass once again and heavily at that.
dem a lick out all the batty... violently... swiftly sucking out battyhole
oh and btw DK
Lycan my yute lycan
Profound 02-14-2006, 09:37 PM Skillachi- you nasty.
I don't see what is everyone's problem. I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. The Lycans were not the feature for part 2. They were already all but exterminated in the first movie. It was all about a reorganization of the Vampires.
I thought it was an excellent movie. The hybrid is the pwner.
Skillachi 02-15-2006, 09:36 AM Is not me nasty... its the directors... they are the one in the battyhole. :p
well w/e yah. I am glad i never paid to watch that
Omega X 02-17-2006, 02:33 AM Well you have to also remember that the lycans in the first movie were the advanced ones that could think properly and change back to human form while these were just wild uncontrolable beast.
Truth be told all though alot of things were jus messed up in the sense of lacking logic. As much as is possible that is. Everything was perfectly reasoned out.
I mean Willian was just a raving beast, end of story a very big dog with Rabis. And yah locked up for 500 years in a half sardine tin I still can't get over that one.
hmmm I think I'll get bitten by a bat and a wolf at the same time then I will have both power XD Yah that is it.
[is insulting ridiculus notion of how vampires and werwolf came into being in this story]
Skillachi 02-17-2006, 10:58 AM Ok after re-watching it i do realize that william was supposed to be a raving beast. But how can he after being locked up for over 5 centuries be strong enough to take on the world again...
How can the first (and im assuming because of this the most powerful) werewolf lose to a guy that was just revived and still had not feed on any blood for the entire movie...
Cho and you say our story has plot holes... this movies has plot craters!!
Omega X 02-17-2006, 11:09 AM Well he did get his rear end handed to him, top of his head more like it so I doubt he took on the world.
death_knight 02-17-2006, 01:18 PM I gotta agree with omega on the fact of vampiric beings. being bitten by a bat and a wolf. really they left the father of all vampires out of it count dracula himself. they should have kept true to the story of vampires. dracula 2000' i think gave a marvelous explanation to how dracula came into being. and then he spread his inhuman attributes like a plague onto the children of god remaking the wold in his own image as the new god all out of hadred for God himself.. dracula was non other than judas. the explanation for why he couldn't die was God made him suffer for all eternity for betraying Jesus. why he hated silver was because he was paid with gold and silver why he hated the cross was becasue he saw jesus on the cross and the reason for this was his betrayal. he tried to comit suicide he couldn't die.. it was by far the most logical explanation of how vampires came about i had ever seen.
underworld should have taken from dracula's book.
Omega X 02-17-2006, 04:50 PM Wow were have you seen that? Crap! there goes the concept for my newest book damnit ><.
Of coure my idea wasn't to use Judas but some of what you said there kinda links to what I was thinking up. Tell me more let me see just how much alike my idea was.
Damn the world is running out of ideas.....
You say it was Dracula 2000?
Please just tell me a bit more cause I've never heard of this.
thelokat 02-18-2006, 07:18 PM I gotta agree with omega on the fact of vampiric beings. being bitten by a bat and a wolf. really they left the father of all vampires out of it count dracula himself. they should have kept true to the story of vampires. dracula 2000' i think gave a marvelous explanation to how dracula came into being. and then he spread his inhuman attributes like a plague onto the children of god remaking the wold in his own image as the new god all out of hadred for God himself.. dracula was non other than judas. the explanation for why he couldn't die was God made him suffer for all eternity for betraying Jesus. why he hated silver was because he was paid with gold and silver why he hated the cross was becasue he saw jesus on the cross and the reason for this was his betrayal. he tried to comit suicide he couldn't die.. it was by far the most logical explanation of how vampires came about i had ever seen.
underworld should have taken from dracula's book.
yes but what about the ginger? :eusa_snoo
death_knight 02-19-2006, 01:03 AM you mean garlic. that i'm really not 100% sure about. as i said, its by far the most logical explanation didn't say it was full proof but its the closest we've gotten so far... underworld is way too flawed. we got no background detail on the father of the corvinus twins either. we have no clue why he was immortal it was extremely annoying to me, not knowing why.
thelokat 02-19-2006, 10:52 PM as soon as i came on tonight i thought to myself *damn i gotta go change that post*...look how the man loud it up *glares* ...but yeah...garlic...and the movie sucked...full stop, argument done, topic can lock
dragonchic1986 09-20-2006, 08:48 PM I was a tad disappointed. Especially when she got the guys blood. "What will I become?" .... "The future" and that's it? I was really disappointed. Oh well.
|